The Renaissance the Reformation and the Rise of Nations
See a Problem?
Thank you for telling united states of america most the problem.
Friend Reviews
Reader Q&A
Be the commencement to enquire a question about The Renaissance, the Reformation and the Rising of Nations
Community Reviews
In the year where we commemorate the 500th anniversary of Martin Luther issuing his Ninety-Five theses, Prof Fix'due south coverage of the Reformation is splendid. I certainly gained a much greater understanding of its course, and the attending to the 'outliers' of religious non-conformity such as the Anabaptists was interesting. Ready's view of Luther's actions is to emphasise their gradual quality and the fact that he certainly wasn't looking to create a new church, or indeed even to seriously claiming the Pope's position at first. It was the church building's conclusion to vehemently oppose Luther's challenges that Gear up sees as the decisive factor. He highlights the other challenges to areas of the church that required reform that had non attracted the aforementioned attending, and the fact that Luther's claiming to indulgences certainly wasn't unique. Prepare does adamantly state that the theses weren't nailed to a church door in Wittenberg, a fact that my reading suggests is yet debatable.
Fix'southward account of the religious wars is audio, highlighting the significance early on of Luther'south determination to 'politicize' his entrada (the so-chosen Magisterial Reformation).
The seventeen century is fascinating, with Prepare adopting the famous "Crisis of the Seventeenth Century" historical debate to argue that there was a crisis which was both economic and political. The greatest crisis was the 30 years state of war. Set argues that although the war ended religious wars and encouraged the separation of religion and state it also left Germany devastated, although the kernel of possibility for the futurity was left with the Prussian-Brandenburg land.
The sixteenth and seventeenth centuries were quite 'German' in their focus, only once Fix begins looking at the 'Rising of Nations', comparison authoritarianism and other political structures, his geographic focus broadens to consider French republic, the Holy Roman Empire, Spain, England and the Dutch republic. His assessment of the Dutch republic is quite positive and I would similar to read more on this topic as some books I take dipped into seem more equivocal about its effectiveness and how democratic it was. Fix states in the accompanying guide that the republic "evolved a arrangement of checks and balances that worked well to provide a stable and representative government." That may be merely the disunity of the Commonwealth in terms of whether to proceed the state of war with Spain later on the truce generated much controversy. Thomas Munck writes in Seventeenth-Century Europe: State, Conflict and Social Lodge in Europe 1598-1700 that "lacking central authorisation except for the loose confederal framework provided past the States General and the ill-defined rival dominance of the stadholder in each province, the republic experienced recurrent crises of authority during the seventeenth century". Certainly the construction of comparative lectures is useful all the same and provides greater clarity than a lot of histories of Europe.
Overall the course is extremely well structured, delivered and interesting. 1 minor quirk is that the lectures seem to finish quite abruptly as though Professor Set up has run out of fourth dimension. Overall still the material is interesting, well structured and the accompanying guidebook is too excellent. ...more
Bad scholarship.
Was surprised at some facts this professor got wrong. He said Prince Arthur died in a gunkhole accident, which is non truthful, he got sick and died in Wales from unknown causes. There was a Prince William that did dice in a boating accident, but it wasn't him. William was Henry I heir, not Henry Seven.Bad scholarship.
...moreThis lecture starts the Renaissance with Florence and even will tell you practically the day that the Renaissance started. In 1382, Florence was in the procedure of losing a state of war with one of their weaker neighbors and the Full general leading the assault against Florence died and thereby saved Florence from defeat.
Thursday
History in it'southward proper context is ever relative to electric current times and is the best antidote to the stupidity in which I routinely see happening around especially during the political flavour.This lecture starts the Renaissance with Florence and even will tell yous practically the day that the Renaissance started. In 1382, Florence was in the procedure of losing a state of war with one of their weaker neighbors and the General leading the assault against Florence died and thereby saved Florence from defeat.
The city fathers decided to look at what had gone wrong and one of the things is they realized that their scholasticism was only geared towards producing Lawyers, Doctors and Theologians and not critical thinkers able to generalize from the particular to the universal (scientific discipline and philosophy previously was not inductive, but deductive, from the universal to the detail).
The city fathers made a concerted effort to teach the people how to think critically and to conceptualize beyond the old standards. By rejecting the quondam ways of scholasticism, they led to providing a modern perspective which will ultimately lead to the Enlightenment. The Florentine city fathers would have realized how nothing could exist more stupid than to accept a politician exist cheered when he says that "a welder is worth more than a philosopher" (this is an actual example from this current political season, and highlights the stupidity currently going on). That argument is wrong for multiple reasons. A person's worth doesn't come from what he does for a living, welders make expert philosophers, and pedagogy one how to think critically is always a good thing to practise. In the case of Florence it's going to ultimately pb to the creation of an Isaac Newton.
I don't want to imply that the reformation and nation building parts of this lecture are not relevant to today'southward times for they are and were simply every bit entertaining every bit the Renaissance parts were. I just wish people who cheered such stupid statements as the one cited higher up would read (or heed) to history and science books and lectures and start to think beyond what they meet on their TVs and blogs and get themselves out of the scholastic mindset and start to learn to think critically.
The lecturer does devote 2 hours to the evolution of scientific discipline up to Isaac Newton and explains the Aristotelian Ptolemaic arrangement better than most books I've read on the evolution of science. He'll cease the lecture at the early Enlightenment, and he covers all the steps that are necessary for the creation of an Isaac Newton and a Pierre Bayle (ane of my all time favorite people and I'one thousand glad this lecture gives him his proper place within the Enlightenment, if only briefly).
...more thanAppropriate to the times.....
Plague, upheaval and revolts..... sounds like today!
Excellent!!!
********************
2016 review:
Really fantabulous. Very very worthwhile.
The best part of information technology is, without dubiousness, almost Reformation. Hither the lector offers interesting insights, really helps to organise a lot of data and goes across the general thought of 'Luther-xc thesis-church-bad'
As for the renaissance, late medieval likewise as early on age of enlightenment parts - they are very wide and full general. I came into this grade later on finishing three parts on Earl I actually like the bulk of the Great Courses lectures, especially the long ones, simply this ane was a challenge.
The best function of it is, without doubt, near Reformation. Hither the lector offers interesting insights, really helps to organise a lot of information and goes beyond the general thought of 'Luther-90 thesis-church-bad'
As for the renaissance, late medieval likewise as early on age of enlightenment parts - they are very broad and general. I came into this course subsequently finishing iii parts on Early, High and Late Middle ages by Philip Daileader (also TGC lecturer) and i experience like they offer a better insight on the Renaissance role, though they don't spend nearly equally much fourth dimension dwelling on it. Aforementioned for the enlightenment. This might be okay if you lot really have no previous knowledge and just want to get a general impression of the age, but if yous are interested in deeper accept i wouldn't suggest this course.
Lecturer is at times very captivating and interesting, and at times very hard to become through. All in all this was okay as a lecture course, though i wouldn't recommend information technology if y'all want to deepen your knowledge near these periods. Yous should check separate TGC courses for this, or only listen to the Reformation part, which was really great. ...more
This is a petty detail but
Information technology'southward a long audio book but the lectures in it are interesting and comprehend a lot of topics. I do wish the lecturer spent more fourth dimension about the Fine art of the Renaissance as that was the main reason I wanted to listen to it in the first place. Unfortunately the Art department simply received one whole lecture and then related details were sprinkled throughout a few other lectures. If you're checking this out for the Art, know that he talks about Art for less than five% of the audio volume.This is a little item only I wasn't certain if I could listen to his voice for the whole affair as he sounded dry and deadening at the beginning. Fortunately the lecturer knows his stuff and covers a lot of details on different subjects which makes up for it. Likewise he only sounds dry out and wearisome at the beginning but he shakes that off after the first x minutes.
I did similar how the lessons were organized. Much of his lectures happened at the same fourth dimension during this menses then he split information technology up to focus on one surface area or person, like England or Luther, before backtracking and focusing on another country/person and their history. On a few lectures for one bailiwick he funnels all of the timelines into 1 conclusive lesson to wrap upwardly everything related to information technology.
...more- Good engaging speaker
- his Reformation portion is adequately well done.
The bad
- Some information is flat wrong or misleading.
- He generalizes way besides much. Europe was most definitely not a monolithic cake.
- Lacks context, this is high school level overview with the lack of insight of that level.
- A europe-axial view that fails even to consider the broader Mediterranean much less global pressures."
- He
- Good engaging speaker
- his Reformation portion is fairly well done.
The bad
- Some information is flat wrong or misleading.
- He generalizes way too much. Europe was most definitely not a monolithic cake.
- Lacks context, this is loftier schoolhouse level overview with the lack of insight of that level.
- A europe-centric view that fails even to consider the broader Mediterranean much less global pressures."
- He knows nothing about the conquest and discovery of the new world, but what he learned in High School,
Id requite this one a hard laissez passer. If the lecturer wasnt such a practiced speaker I would of probably gave it a lower rating.
...moreI quite enjoyed this and found this interesting enough to hold my involvement through this long rather complicated lecture.
That said the author got lots of unproblematic, Google-able information incorrect. It leads to doubt about the author/professor/historians actually basic cognition abd understanding of this subject.
Again virtually of the errors could've been corrected with a simple Wikipedia search as it'southward dates, ancestry, etc.
This is a dynamic and convoluted period in British history.
W
I quite enjoyed this and plant this interesting plenty to concur my interest through this long rather complicated lecture.
That said the author got lots of uncomplicated, Google-able information incorrect. It leads to incertitude about the author/professor/historians actually basic knowledge abd understanding of this subject.
Again almost of the errors could've been corrected with a simple Wikipedia search as it'south dates, beginnings, etc.
This is a dynamic and convoluted period in British history.
Whew chile!
I've read other books on the period and wasn't sure what to expect the additive value to be of this volume but was pleased to obtain an first-class understanding off the catamenia personalized to conditions within each if the Eu counties involved. I learned things about the cultures if these regions that is never known. I'd definitely recommend this to those interests in the period.
...more than
In that location was not demonstrated the connections of all the events here and that was defective it seemed in both the book and the presentation but in my heed it is merging together the whole course and the stream of events (I think). ...more
Welcome dorsum. Merely a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account.
The Renaissance the Reformation and the Rise of Nations
Posted by: jasonviberand40.blogspot.com
Comments
Post a Comment